بررسی سبک رهبری خدمتگزار در پیش‌بینی هویت ورزشی دانشجویان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه جامعه‌شناسی ورزشی، دانشکدۀ تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه جامعه‌شناسی ورزشی، دانشکدۀ تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه جامعه‌شناسی ورزشی، دانشکدۀ تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف تحقیق حاضر بررسی سبک رهبری خدمتگزار در پیش‌بینی هویت ورزشی دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است. در این پژوهش 296 آزمودنی شرکت داشتند. از این بین 72/53 درصد (159 نفر) پسر و 28/46 درصد (137 نفر) دختر بودند. میانگین سنی آزمودنی‌ها 85/22 بود. ابزار اندازه‌گیری شامل پرسشنامۀ رهبری خدمتگزار سازمانی لاب و پرسشنامۀ ارزیابی هویت ورزشی بود. نتایج رگرسیون خطی نشان داد که سبک رهبری خدمتگزار، هویت ورزشی، زیرمقیاس‌های انحصارگرایی، هویت خود، تأثیرپذیری منفی، تأثیرپذیری مثبت، مؤلفه‌های درونی هویت ورزشی و مؤلفه‌های بیرونی هویت ورزشی را پیش‌بینی می‌کند (05/0≥P). از طرفی سبک رهبری خدمتگزار نمی‌تواند هویت اجتماعی دانشجویان را پیش‌بینی کند (05/0≤P). بنابراین پیشنهاد می‌شود که مدرسان درس تربیت بدنی در دانشگاه‌ها هویت ورزشی را به‌عنوان سازه‌ای مهم اجتماعی مورد توجه قرار دهند. همچنین با کشف ابعاد تأثیرگذار بر آن، گام‌های ارزشمندی در این زمینه بردارند که موجب مشارکت ورزشی بیشتر دانشجویان شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation of Servant leadership Style in Predicting Athletic Identity among Students

نویسندگان [English]

  • Siamak Alborz 1
  • Bahram Ghadimi 2
  • Akbar Afarinesh khaki 3
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Sport Sociology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran South Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Sport Sociology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Sport Sociology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran South Branch, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

 
The aim of this study was to investigate the leadership style of the servant in predicting athletic identity of the students in Islamic Azad University. 296 subjects participated in this study who 53.72% of them were male (N=159) and 46.28% of them were female (N=137). The mean age of the subjects was 22.85 years. Measuring instruments were included organizational servant leadership Revolution LOB and Sports identity. Linear regression indicated that servant leadership style could predict sports identity, monopoly, self-identity, negative impact, positive affect, internal components of sport identity and external components of sport identity (P≤0.05). On the other hand, servant leadership style could not predict the social identity of the students (P≥0.05). Therefore, it is suggested that physical education instructors in the universities consider sports identity as an important social structure. In addition, by discovering the dimensions that affect it, take significant steps in this regard and can result in more sports contribution in students.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Male and Female Students
  • servant leadership style
  • Sports Identity
  1. [Gill D, Williams L]. Psychological dynamics of sport and exercise . Champaign: Human Kinetics. Inc; 2000.
  2. Azadfada S, Tondnevis F, Kazemnejad A. The relationship among servant leadership style, team effectiveness, and team performance in the Iranian men's Volleyball pro-league teams 2014;3(6):159-75(In Persian).
  3. Humphreys JH. Contextual implications for transformational and servant leadership: A historical investigation. Management decision. 2005;43(10):1410-31.
  4. Rieke M, Hammermeister J, Chase M. Servant leadership in sport: A new paradigm for effective coach behavior. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2008;3(2):227-39.
  5. Parris DL, Peachey JW. A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of business ethics. 2013;113(3):377-93.
  6. Cho O, Kim S. The Impact of Coaches' Servant Leadership on Athletes' Athletic Performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2014;85(S1):A109.
  7. Brohi NA, Jantan AH, Qureshi MA, Bin Jaffar AR, et al. The impact of servant leadership on employees attitudinal and behavioural outcomes. Cogent Business & Management. 2018;5(1):1542652.
  8. Woo B. Relationship between Servant Leadership Attributes and Trust in Leaders: A Case of Sport Instructors in South Korea. Sport Journal. 2018.
  9. Lee YH. Emotional intelligence, servant leadership, and development goal orientation in athletic directors. Sport Management Review. 2018.
  10. Amorose AJ, Horn TS. Intrinsic motivation: Relationships with collegiate athletes’ gender, scholarship status, and perceptions of their coaches’ behavior. Journal of sport and exercise psychology. 2000;22(1):63-84.
  11. Horn TS. Coaching effectiveness in the sport domain. 2002.
  12. Good AJ, Brewer BW, Petitpas AJ, Van Raalte JL, et al. Identity foreclosure, athletic identity, and college sport participation. The Academic Athletic Journal. 1993;8:1-12.
  13. Martin JJ. Psychosocial aspects of youth disability sport. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly. 2006;23(1):65-77.
  14. Cieslak TJ. Describing and measuring the athletic identity construct: Scale development and validation: The Ohio State University; 2004.
  15. Martin JJ, Eklund RC, Mushett CA. Factor structure of the athletic identity measurement scale with athletes with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly. 1997;14(1):74-82.
  16. Brewer BW, Van Raalte JL, Linder DE. Athletic identity: Hercules' muscles or Achilles heel? International journal of sport psychology. 1993.
  17. Horton RS, Mack DE. Athletic identity in marathon runners: Functional focus or dysfunctional commitment? Journal of sport behavior. 2000;23(2).
  18. Matheson H, Brewer B, Van Raalte J. 36 Athletic identity of national level badminton players: a cross-cultural analysis. Science and racket sports. 1995:228.
  19. Tasiemski T, Kennedy P, Gardner BP, Blaikley RA. Athletic identity and sports participation in people with spinal cord injury. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly. 2004;21(4):364-78.
  20. Wiechman SA, Williams J. Relation of athletic identity to injury and mood disturbance. Journal of Sport Behavior. 1997;20(2):199.
  21. Hurst R, Hale B, Smith D, Collins D. Exercise dependence, social physique anxiety, and social support in experienced and inexperienced bodybuilders and weightlifters. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2000;34(6):431-5.
  22. Anderson CB, MÂsse LC, Hergenroeder AC. Factorial and construct validity of the athletic identity questionnaire for adolescents. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2007;39(1):59-69.
  23. Burns GN, Jasinski D, Dunn SC, Fletcher D. Athlete identity and athlete satisfaction: The nonconformity of exclusivity. Personality and Individual Differences. 2012;52(3):280-4.
  24. Cabrita T, Rosado A, Marcos V, Serpa S. Relaciones entre identidad atlética y personalidad en el deporte de competición. Revista de Psicología del Deporte. 2014;23(2):0247-253.
  25. Yukhymenko-Lescroart MA. On identity and sport conduct of student-athletes: Considering athletic and academic contexts. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2018;34:10-9.
  26. Shajih R, Sohrabi M, Fooladian J. Comparison of the sport identity of the players of the national handball teams of Iran. Journal of Sport Sciences Research. 2010;4:87-104 (In Persian).
  27. Lamont-Mills A, Christensen SA. Athletic identity and its relationship to sport participation levels. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2006;9(6):472-8.
  28. Williams DJ. An examination of athletic identity, sport commitment, time in sport, social support, life satisfaction, and holistic wellness in college student-athletes: The University of North Carolina at Greensboro; 2007.
  29. norouzi Seyyed Hosseini R, fathi H, boroujerdi ss. The Relationship between Leadership Styles and the Evolution of the Judo of the Elite of Iran Sport Management Studies. 2012;4(16):189-206(In Persian).
  30. Keshavarz L, Farahani A, Najdsamiei M. The relationship between leadership style of the coaches of the Premier League teams with the sporting identity of the female elite handball players of Iran Scientific Journal Of Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies. 2014;1(4):69-78(In Persian).
  31. Hemmatinezhad MA, Shafiei Kordshouli S, Hajiabadi M. Relationship between leadership style of coaches and the identity of the players of the Iranian Handball Premier League Sport Physiology & Management Investigations. 2016;8(3):79-92(In Persian).
  32. Nourbakhsh P, Bazmavard, Soroush The relationship between leadership styles of coaches with sport identity and athletes' satisfaction in selected team sports and individual sports. Journal of sport management and motor behavior. 2016;12(24):121-34 (In Persian).
  33. Aghaei M, Moharramzadeh M, Vahdani M, Hoseinpour E. The relationship among servant leadership style, team effectiveness, and team performance in the Iranian men's Volleyball pro-league teams Sport Psychology Review. 2013;2(3):51-62(In Persian).
  34. Sedghianizadeh R. The Effect of General Physical Education on the Athletic Identity of Islamic Azad University Students (Case Study Islamic Azad University, Tehran North Branch): Tehran North Branch; 2017.
  35. hosin TMh. The Effects of General Physical Education Units 1 and 2 on Sports Identity of Students at Birjand University: Birjand University; 2011.
  36. Hosseininia R RB, Rahimzadeh M. Relationship of leadership style of coach service with teamwork and satisfaction of athletes of Iran Handball Leagues Sport management. 2015;3(8):480-67(In Persian).
  37. Ashoore S HBH, HosseiniNia S. The relationship between coaches’ servant leadership style with coach trust and performance of collegiate sport team Research on university sport. 2015;7(12):39-56 (In Persian).