ارائۀ الگویی برای برنامۀ آموزش المپیک در ایران

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه علوم ورزشی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه جهرم، جهرم، ایران

2 استاد، گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکدۀ تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار، دانشکدۀ تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اسلامشهر، ایران

4 استادیار، گروه علوم ورزشی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه کاشان، کاشان، ایران

چکیده

 
هدف از پژوهش حاضر تدوین الگوی آموزش المپیک در ایران بود. این پژوهش از نوع مطالعات کیفی است که به روش نظریۀ بنیادی صورت گرفت. جامعۀ هدف پژوهش را کلیۀ نخبگان که به‌نحوی در آموزش و پژوهش در حیطۀ جنبش المپیک، نقش و سابقۀ روشنی داشتند، تشکیل می‌دادند. در این پژوهش، از دو روش نمونه‌گیری نظری و گلوله‌برفی استفاده شد. ابزار جمع‌آوری داده­ها شامل مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌سازمان‌یافته بود که محقق در قالب 19 مصاحبه به اشباع نظری رسید. در تحلیل یافته‌های پژوهش از پنج مفهوم شرایط علی، شرایط مداخله‌گر، شرایط زمینه‌ای، راهبردها و پیامدها، در قالب الگوی کدگذاری استراس و کوربن (1990) استفاده شد. به‌طور کلی نتایج این پژوهش، با مشخص کردن وضعیت آموزش المپیک در ایران و تدوین الگوی آموزش المپیک در ایران نشان داد، می‌توان آموزش المپیک را با توجه به شرایط مداخله‌گر و زمینه­ای حاصل از این پژوهش، از طریق راهبردهای آموزشی و پژوهشی، فرهنگی و بومی، ورزش قهرمانی، تبلیغات و اطلاع‌رسانی در ایران توسعه داد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Development of the Olympic education model for Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamidreza Safarijafarloo 1
  • nasroolah sajadi 2
  • Farideh Hadavi 3
  • Amir Ghanbarpour 4
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Jahrom University, Jahrom, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kashan University, Kashan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Abstract
The main objective of this research was making a comprehensive model of Olympic education for Iran. This study used qualitative method and was performed by grounded theory. Purpose population of this study includes all elites who are elite in education and research about Olympic movement. These elites included executives and executives, champions and coaches participating in the Olympics, and scholars and faculty members. In this research, both theoretical and snowball sampling was used. Data were collected by 19 Semi-structured interviews. The findings of study included five categories of causal conditions, intervening conditions, contextual conditions, strategies and consequences were presented in the form of Strauss and Corbin’s coded pattern. Overall, this research by hhighlighting the status of the Olympic education in Iran and the development of the Olympic education model in Iran, show that Olympic education in Iran can be performed by some strategy include educational, cultural, championship and advertising.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Olympic education
  • Olympism
  • Olympic movement
  • model
  • Grounded theory
  1. Pawłucki A. Olympic education as an intergenerational relation of the third degree. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research. 2009 Dec 1;46(1):99-108
  2. Ghafouri F, Mirzai B, Henry H and Hanover A. [The impact of Olympic education on the attitudes of university students across the country (in Persian)]. The Quarterly Olympics, Sixteenth.2008; 41: 71-77.
  3. Hai, R. Olympic Education Program in China and its post-Olympic implementation. 49th international session for young participants , 2009.
  4. Corral CD, Pérez-Turpin JA, Vidal AM, Padorno CM, Patiño M, Martínez J, Molina AG. PRINCIPLES OF THE OLYMPIC MOVEMENT. Journal of Human Sport & Exercise. 2010 Jan 1; 5(1).
  5. Sajjadi, N. [Meet the Olympic Movement (in Persian)]. Tehran: Publication of the National Olympic Committee, 2006.
  6. International Olympic Committee (IOC). Olympic Charter. Lausanne: IOC, 2011.
  7. Wang Y, Masumoto N. Olympic education at model schools for the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. International Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2009 Dec 30;7:31-41.
  8. Hassandra M, Goudas M, Hatzigeorgiadis A, Theodorakis Y. A fair play intervention program in school Olympic education. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 2007 Jun 1;22(2):99.
  9. Majauskienė D, Šukys S, Lisinskienė A. Spread of knowledge on olympism in school applying the integrated programme of olympic education. LKKA. 2011:42.

10.Constantinides, A. Olympic Education in Greek school. 14th international seminar Olympic study for postgraduate student , 2006.

11.Schnitzer M, Peters M, Scheiber S, Pocecco E. Perception of the culture and education programme of the Youth Olympic Games by the participating athletes: A case study for Innsbruck 2012. The International Journal of the History of Sport. 2014 Jun 13;31(9):1178-93.

12.Parry J. Sport and Olympism: Universals and multiculturalism. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport. 2006 Oct 1;33(2):188-204.

13.Grammatikopoulos V, Papacharisis V, Koustelios A, Tsigilis N, Theodorakis Y. Evaluation of the training program for Greek Olympic education. International journal of educational management. 2004 Jan 1;18(1):66-73.

14.Gessman, R. Olympic education, fair play and their practice in schools. The Official Publication of the European Fair Play Movement Academic Supplement, 2010; 8: 2.

15.Chatziefstathiou D. Olympic education and beyond: Olympism and value legacies from the Olympic and Paralympic Games. Educational Review. 2012 Aug 1;64(3):385-400.

16.Lenskyj HJ. Olympic education and Olympism: Still colonizing children’s minds. Educational Review. 2012 Aug 1;64(3):265-74.

17.Naul R. Olympic pedagogy as a theory of development of ethical and humanistic values in education. Sporto mokslas. 2008;3(53):9-15.

18.Barker D, Barker-Ruchti N, Rynne SB, Lee J. Olympism as education: Analysing the learning experiences of elite athletes. Educational Review. 2012 Aug 1;64(3):369-84.

19.Pringle R. Debunking Olympic sized myths: government investment in Olympism in the context of terror and the risk society. Educational Review. 2012 Aug 1;64(3):303-16.

20.Hamidi, M; Khosrowmanish, R. [Designing an Olympic Model in Schools. Abstract of the second international Olympiad and Paralympic Olympiad (in Persian)]. Tehran: National Olympic Committee Publications, 2007.

21.Binder, D. Be a champion in life: An international teacher’s resource manual. Athens: Foundation for Olympic and Sport Education, 2000.

22.Binder, D. Teaching values: An Olympic education toolkit. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee. 2007.

23.Binder DL. Olympic values education: evolution of pedagogy. Educational Review. 2012 Aug 1;64(3):275-302.

24.Georgiadis K. The implementation of Olympic Education Programs at world level. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010 Jan 1;2(5):6711-8.

25.Guang, P. D. Olympic Education in China. Journal o f Capital Institute of Phy sical Education. 2008; 20(3): 2-8.

26.Knijnik J, Tavares O. Educating Copacabana: a critical analysis of the “Second Half”, an Olympic education program of Rio 2016. Educational Review. 2012 Aug 1;64(3):353-68.

27.Monnin E. The Olympic Movement’s strategy for the integration of the concept of Olympic education into the education system: the French example. Educational review. 2012 Aug 1;64(3):333-51.

28.Pitney WA, Parker J. Qualitative research in physical activity and the health professions. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2009.

29.Strauss, A and Corbin, J. Principles and methodology of qualitative research, basic theory and practices. Translat by Mohammadi B, Tehran: Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2006.

30.Alwani, M; Adel Azar D H. [Methodology of Qualitative Research in Management: A Comprehensive Approach (in persian)]. Tehran: Eshraghi Publishing House, 2011.