مدل‌یابی الگوی توسعة ارزش‌های اخلاقی فضیلت‌گرا در ورزش قهرمانی ایران براساس ارزش‌های اخلاقی گفتمانی و نتیجه‌گرایی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترا، گروه جامعه‌شناسی ورزش، دانشکدة علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه جامعه‌شناسی ورزش، دانشکدة علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکدة مدیریت، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

 
در دنیای امروز، ورزش در ابعاد قهرمانی و حرفه‌ای به اخلاقیات جدید نیاز دارد، تا براساس آن زمینة سنجش و ارزیابی رفتارهای ورزشی فراهم آید. این پژوهش تدوین توسعة ارزش‌های اخلاقی را با دلالت‌هایی بر سازه‌گرایی و عقلانیت ارتباطی الگوسازی کرد. پس از تأیید روایی محتوایی و ساختاری، پایایی ابزار جمع‌آوری اطلاعات با روش آلفای کرونباخ 89/0 α=تأیید شد. روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند قضاوتی بود که با استفاده از جدول مورگان150نخبه و صاحب‌نظر در حوزة اخلاق و ورزش قهرمانی به‌دست آمد. الگوی مفهومی پژوهش با استفاده از روش الگوسازی معادلات ساختاری با رویکرد کمترین مربعات جزئی و نرم‌افزارPLS  Smart بررسی شد. الگوی توسعة ارزش‌های اخلاقی طبق تئوری کنش ارتباطی هابرماس در قالب سه عامل اصلی: ارزش‌های اخلاق گفتمانی، ارزش‌های اخلاق نتیجه‌گرا و ارزش‌های اخلاق فضیلت‌گرا و 35 معیار مرتبط تدوین شده است. ضرایب بتای استانداردشدة رگرسیون PLS نقش واسط قوی و کامل اخلاق نتیجه‌گرایی در رابطة بین اخلاق گفتمانی و اخلاق فضیلت‌گرایی را نشان داد. مقادیر p برای متوسط ضریب مسیر و متوسط ضریب تعیین، کمتر از 05/0 و متوسط عامل تورم واریانس، کمتر از 5 است که نشان‌دهندة برازش مطلوب الگوی تدوین‌شده است. ازاین‌رو توسعة ارزش‌های اخلاق فضیلت‌گرایی از برایند حوزه‌های فرهنگی اقتصادی است و تحت تأثیر اخلاق گفتمانی و نقش واسط اخلاق نتیجه‌گرایی حاصل می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Providing a Model for the Development of Virtuosity Moral Values in the Iranian Championship Sport Based on Discourse and Consequential Moral Values

نویسندگان [English]

  • Marjan Amirimoghadam 1
  • Bahram Ghadimi 2
  • Zahra Alipordarvishi 3
1 PhD Student, Department of Sociology of Sport, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Sociology of Sport, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of management, Faculty of management, North Tehran Branch , Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

 
In today's world, championship and professional sports require new ethics in order to provide a basis for assessing and evaluating sport behaviors. The present study was designed to develop a model for the development of moral values with implications for constructivism and instrumental rationality. Firstly, content and structural validity were confirmed; then, the reliability of the data collection tool was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.89). The sampling method was purposive judgmental obtained by Morgan table for 150 elites in the field of ethics and championship sport. The conceptual model of the study was investigated by structural equation modeling method with partial least squares approach and the Smart PLS software. The model for the development of moral values was formulated according to Habermas's Theory of Communication in the three main factors: discourse moral values, consequential moral values, and virtuosity moral values and 35 relevant criteria. Standardized beta coefficients of PLS regression showed a strong and complete mediating role of the consequential ethics in the relationship between the discourse and virtuosity ethics. The values of P for the mean path coefficient and the mean coefficient of determination were less than 0.05 and the mean factor of inflation variance was less than 5, which indicated the good fit of the developed model. Hence, the development of virtuosity moral values is emerging from the economic-cultural domains and is achieved under the influence of discourse ethics and the mediating role of the consequential ethics.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • championship sport
  • communication action
  • consequential moral values
  • discourse moral values
  • virtuosity moral values

مراجع

1.            Naderian Jahromi M. Fighting in sports. First Eediton. Tehran: Nisima publication; 2011:10-36. (In Persian)           
2.            De San Say J, Rosenberg D. Ethics in Sport Management. Translation Seyyed Mohammad Hossein Razavi and Mohsen Bolourian. Tehran: Physical Education Organization Publications. 2005.
3.            Hassanpour J, Dehgar M. Ethicalism from the point of view of critical theory. Quarterly journal of political and international research of Islamic Azad University Shahreza Branch. 2009; 2: 107-138. (In Persian)
4.            Habermas J. Justification and Applicaton: remarks on Discourse ethics. Translation Ciaran Cronin. MA: The MIT Press. 1993.
5.            Ritzer G. Theory of Sociology in Contemporary. Translation Mohsen Solati. Tehran: Scientific Publications. 1995.
6.            Kriyab Y. Classical Social Theory: An Introduction to Marx, Weber, Durkheim, Simmel. Translation Shahnaz Messipurist. Tehran: Publishing Awareness. 2012.
7.            Habermas J. Communicative Theory of Action, Perfectionism. Tehran: the newspaper Iran. Publishing House. 2005.
8.            Stones R. Major thinkers of sociology. Translation Mehrdad Mirdamadi. Tehran: Center publication.2000.
9.            Bashirieh H. The History of Political Thoughts in the Twentieth Century; Marxist Ideas. First Eediton. Tehran: Ney publication. 1997: 222-223. (In Persian)
10.         Farmer P, Arnaudon S. Australian sport policy .National sport policies: An international handbook. Westport: Greenwood Press. 1996:1-22.
11.         Ehsani M, Amiri M, Gharakhani H. Designing and compiling a comprehensive system of professional sports in the country. Physical Education Research Institute. 2014. (In Persian)
12.         Farhadi Y. Ethics and Sport. The First Congress of Sports Psychology, National Olympic Committee of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 1998. (In Persian)
13.         Beller J, Stoll S. A praxeological assessment of the need for reform in United states inter collegiate sport through moral education. Unpublished manuscript. 1995.
14.         Talebian-Nia H, Mozaffari A, Mortazaei B. A Study of the Status of Development of Ethical Behavior in the Championship Sports of the Country and Presentation of the Strategy. Journal of Motion. 2008; 4(37):39-60. (In Persian)
15.         Murray TH. Preserving Sporting Values and Ethics: The relationship between anti-doping and sport values and ethics United national educational, scientific and cultural organization. 2010.
16.         World Anti-Doping Agency. World Anti-Doping Code. Montreal: World Anti-Doping Agency.2003.
17.         U.S. Anti-Doping Agency. What Sport Means in America: A Study of Sport’s Role in Society. Discovery education. 2011.
18.         La Taille Yd. Moral e ética: dimensões intelectuais e afetivas. Porto Alegre: Artmed. Poirier, J., Valladon, S. C., & Raybaut, P. Histórias de vida. Teoria e prática. Oeiras: Celta. 1999.
19.         Binder DL. Teaching Olympism in schools: Olympic Education as a focus on values education: university lectures on the Olympics. Paper presented at the Internacional Chair in Olympism (IOC-UAB) Barcelona. 2005.
20.         Majauskiene D, sukys S, Lisinskiene A. Spread of knowledge on Olympism in school applying the integrated program of Olympic education. SPORTAS. 2011; 80:42-48.
21.         Parry J. Sport and Olympism: Universals and Multiculturalism. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport. 2006; 33:188-204.
22.         Gessman R. Olympic education, fair play and their practice in schools. The Official Publication of the European Fair Play Movement Academic Supplement. 2010; 8(2):23-29.
23.         McNamee M. Olympism, eurocentricity, and transcultural virtues. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport. 2006; 33: 174–187.
24.         Bruno AR. Ethics in Sport - Guidelines for Teacher. Luso-Illyrian Institute for Human Development (ILIDH).2015.
25.         Khabiri M, Rahmaninia F, Pouria A. The Survey of Physical Education Experts Familiarity with the Historical and Social Aspects of the Olympic Games. Olympics Quarterly. 2001; 19: 3-14. (In Persian)
26.         Ghafouri F, Mirzai B, Honary H, Hanover A. The Impact of Olympic Education on Student Attitudes across Universities. The Quarterly Olympics Sixteenth. 2008; 41: 71-77. (In Persian)
27.         Safana M. The Effect of Teaching Principles and Philosophy of Physical Education on Students Philosophical Subjectivity. Quarterly Journal of Educational Neutrality. 2011; 7(21): 44-55.
28.         Safari HR, Sajjadi SN, Hadavi F, Allah A. Formation of Olympic Model in Iran. Ph.D. University of Kharazmi Tehran: Physical Education Faculty.2013. (In Persian)
29.         Kashif M. Ethics, Olympic Games, and Comparisons with Exercise in Ancient Iran. Quarterly Journal of Olympics. 2001; 3(4): 3-7. (In Persian)
30.         Shokrani E, Aghapour SM. Analysis and analysis of the content of the sports programs of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Contemporary Research in the Management of Sport. 2014; 4(8): 81-92. (In Persian)
31.         Hassandra M, Bekiari A, Sakellariou K. Physical education teacher’s verbal aggression and student’s fair play behaviors. Phys. Educ.2007; 64(2):94-101.
32.         Hamidi M, Eli A, Akbari Yazdi H, Hamidi M. Student Sports in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Perspectives and Development Strategies. Sports Management Studies (Physical Education Institute). 2011; 12: 13-26. (In Persian)
33.         Sarmad Z, Bazargan A, Hejazi A. Research methods in behavioral science.
   Tehran: Agah publication. 2008. (In Persian)
34.         Fornell C, Larcker D. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981;18(3): 382-388.
35.         Hulland J. Use of partial least square (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Journal of Strategic Management. 1999; 20: 195–204.
36.         Amani-Saribagloo J, Sepehrian-Azar F, Mahmoudi H. The Relationship between Teacher’s Perceived Organizational Culture of School and their Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International. 2014; 4(2): 41-62. (In Persian)
37.         Haenlein M, Kaplan AM. A beginner’s guide to partial least squares analysis, Understanding Statistics.2004; 3(4): 283–297.
38.         Azar A, Gholamzadeh R, Ghanavati M. Structural Route Modeling in the Management. Application of Smart PLS Software. Tehran: Ghazan Danesh Publication. 2012. (In Persian)
39.         Boxill J. The Ethics of Competition, Jon Boxill “Sport Ethics”, Publisher: Black well, First Edition. 2003.
40.         Talebian Nia H, et al. A Study of the Status of Development of Ethical Behavior in the National Championship Sport and the Presentation of the Strategy. Journal of Motion. . 1387; 37: 171-191.
41.         Amiri Moghaddam M, Ghadimi B , Alipor-darvishi Z. A Model for the Institutionalization of Moral Values in Iran's Championship. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Sociology of Sport, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences,Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. 2018.
42.         Butcher R, Schneider AJ. Fair play as respect for the game. In: Morgan WJ, Meier KV, Schneider AJ, editors. Ethics in sport. Champaign(IL): Human Kinetics. 2001: 21-48.
پژوهش های فیزیولوژی و مدیریت در ورزش
دوره 13، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 1
اردیبهشت 1400
صفحه 105-123

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار