اثر قلدری سازمانی بر استرس شغلی با نقش میانجی‌ درگیری و امنیت شغلی در مربیان ورزشی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه تربیت بدنی، واحد بیرجند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بیرجند، ایران

2 گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، واحد آیت الله آملی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، آمل، ایران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی اثر قلدری سازمانی بر درگیری شغلی و استرس با نقش میانجی‌گر امنیت شغلی در مربیان ورزشی بود. نوع پژوهش توصیفی-همبستگی و به لحاظ هدف کاربردی بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل کلیه مربیان ورزشی باشگاه‌های ورزشی استان خراسان جنوبی (600 نفر) بود. تعداد اعضای نمونه بر مبنای استفاده از جدول کرجسی–مورگان 234 نفر تعیین شد. برای اندازه‌گیری متغیرهای پژوهش از پرسشنامه‌های استاندارد ارزیابی قلدری ایلینویز (2001) و پرسشنامه استرس شغلی پارکر و دکوتیس (1983)، پرسشنامه درگیری شغلی لاداهل و کنجر (1995) و پرسشنامه امنیت شغلی نیسی و همکاران استفاده شد. پایایی ابزارها با آزمون آلفای کرونباخ قلدری سازمانی 99/0، استرس شغلی 74/0 و درگیری شغلی 95/0 و امنیت شغلی 90/0 تائید شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد درگیری شغلی و امنیت شغلی تأثیر معنی‌داری بر استرس شغلی مربیان ورزشی خراسان جنوبی دارند و آن را میانجی‌گری می‌کنند. همچنین قلدری سازمانی از طریق درگیری شغلی و امنیت شغلی تأثیر معنی‌داری بر استرس شغلی مربیان ورزشی خراسان جنوبی دارد. بعلاوه قلدری سازمانی بر درگیری و امنیت شغلی تأثیر منفی دارد. بر اساس یافته‌های پژوهش، شناسایی و کنترل عوامل ایجادکننده و تشدیدکننده رفتارهای انحرافی و زمینه‌های بروز آن به دلیل اثرات منفی قلدری بر استرس، عملکرد شغلی، سلامت روانی و امنیت شغلی کارکنان می‌تواند مؤثر باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of organizational bullying on job stress with mediating role of job involvement and job security in Sports Coaches

نویسندگان [English]

  • Iman Safaei 1
  • Neda Goleyj 2
1 Department of Physical Education, Birjand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Birjand, Iran.
2 Sport Management Department, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran
چکیده [English]

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of organizational bullying on job involvement and stress with mediating role of job security in sports coaches. The type of research was descriptive-correlational. The statistical population of this study included all sports coaches (600 people) in South Khorasan province. The sample size was 234 based on the Krejcie-Morgan table. To measure the research variables, the Illinois Bullying Scale (2001) and the Parker & Dekotis (1983) Job Stress Questionnaire, the Ladahel & Kanger Job Inventory (1995) and the Nice et al. Job Security Questionnaire were used to measure the variables. The validity of the questionnaires was confirmed by the opinions of 10 teachers and physical education experts. The reliability of the instruments was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha for organizational bullying 0.99, job stress 0.74 and job involvement 0.95 and job security 0.90.The finding showed that job involvement and job security have a significant effect on job stress and mediate it. Also, organizational bullying through job involvement and job security have a significant effect on job stress of South Khorasan sports coaches.Based on the findings of this study, identifying and controlling the factors that cause and exacerbate deviant behaviors and its incidence due to the negative effects of bullying on stress, job performance, mental health and job security can be effective.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Job Involvement
  • Job security
  • Job Stress
  • Organizational Bullying
  1. Bennett AA, Bakker AB, Field JG. Recovery from work-related effort: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2018;39(3):262-75.
  2. Kokoroko E, Sanda MA. Effect of workload on job stress of Ghanaian OPD nurses: The role of coworker support. Safety and health at work. 2019;10(3):341-6.
  3. Sonnentag S. The recovery paradox: Portraying the complex interplay between job stressors, lack of recovery, and poor well-being. Research in Organizational Behavior. 2018;38:169-85.
  4. Xia Y, Schyns B, Zhang L. Why and when job stressors impact voice behaviour: An ego depletion perspective. Journal of Business Research. 2020;109:200-9.
  5. Vui-Yee K, Yen-Hwa T. When does ostracism lead to turnover intention? The moderated mediation model of job stress and job autonomy. IIMB Management Review. 2019.
  6. Norris LA, Didymus FF, Kaiseler M. Stressors, coping, and well-being among sports coaches: A systematic review. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2017;33:93-112.
  7. Ahmad S, Kalim R, Kaleem A. Academics’ perceptions of bullying at work: Insights from Pakistan. International journal of educational management. 2017;18(4):204-220.
  8. Peregrin T. Managing adult bullying behavior in the professional domain. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2019;119(8):1383-7.
  9. Hsu F-S, Liu Y-a, Tsaur S-H. The impact of workplace bullying on hotel employees’ well-being. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 2019;31(4): 1702-1719.
  10. Homayouni A, Hashemi Sheikh Shabani I, Naami A , Bashlideh K. The relationship between organizational bullying and chronic fatigue and occupational cognitive impairments. Occupational health in Iran. 2015;12(2):1-12.
  11. Van den Brande W, Baillien E, De Witte H, Vander Elst T, Godderis L. The role of work stressors, coping strategies and coping resources in the process of workplace bullying: A systematic review and development of a comprehensive model.Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2016;29:61-71.
  12. Gupta R, Bakhshi A. Workplace bullying and employee well-being: A moderated mediation model of resilience and perceived victimization. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health. 2018;33(2):96-115.
  13. Duru P, Ocaktan ME, Çelen Ü, Örsal Ö. The effect of workplace bullying perception on psychological symptoms: a structural equation approach. Safety and health at work. 2018;9(2):210-5.
  14. Kabat-Farr D, Cortina LM, Marchiondo LA. The emotional aftermath of incivility: Anger, guilt, and the role of organizational commitment. International Journal of Stress Management. 2018;25(2):109.
  15. Kotzé M, Nel P. The influence of job resources on platinum mineworkers’ work engagement and organisational commitment: An explorative study. The Extractive Industries and Society. 2020.
  16. Singh V. The Impact of Job Engagement and Organizational Commitment on Organizational Performance: Evidence from India. Management Techniques for Employee Engagement in Contemporary Organizations: IGI Global; 2019;218-235.
  17. Zhang J, Akhtar MN, Bal PM, Zhang Y, Talat U. How do high-performance work systems affect individual outcomes: a multilevel perspective. Frontiers in psychology. 2018;9:586.
  18. Sohrabi A HK, Molavi Z, Akhavan Kharazian M. The role of organizational bullying in the psychological characteristics of the job (job conflict, stress and job insecurity) studied: Branches of one of the selected banks in Qom province. Management Research in Iran. 2018;22(3):161-80.
  19. Chan SHJ, Lai HYI. Understanding the link between communication satisfaction, perceived justice and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of business research. 2017;70:214-223.
  20. Ghaffari SH AM. Determining the role of perception of organizational bullying in the relationship between job stress and the desire to leave the service in the staff of the Ministry of Sports and Youth. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management Studies in Sport. 2017;4(4):101-11.
  21. Salanova M, Ortega-Maldonado A. Psychological capital development in organizations: an integrative review of evidence-based intervention programs. Positive Psychological Intervention Design and Protocols for Multi-Cultural Contexts: Springer; 2019;81-102.
  22. Tisu L, Lupșa D, Vîrgă D, Rusu A. Personality characteristics, job performance and mental health: the mediating role of work engagement. Personality and Individual Differences. 2020;153:109644.
  23. Låstad L, Näswall K, Berntson E, Seddigh A, Sverke M. The roles of shared perceptions of individual job insecurity and job insecurity climate for work-and health-related outcomes: A multilevel approach. Economic and Industrial Democracy. 2018;39(3):422-38.
  24. Ageeva E, Melewar TC, Foroudi P, Dennis C, Jin Z. Examining the influence of corporate website favorability on corporate image and corporate reputation: Findings from fsQCA. Journal of Business Research. 2018;89:287-304.
  25. Page SJ, Bentley T, Teo S, Ladkin A. The dark side of high performance human resource practices in the visitor economy. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2018;74:122-129.
  26. Loh MY, Idris MA, Dormann C, Muhamad H. Organisational climate and employee health outcomes: A systematic review. Safety Science. 2019;118:442-52.
  27. Rajalakshmi M, Naresh B. Influence of psychological contract on workplace bullying. Aggression and violent behavior. 2018;41:90-7.
  28. Yun S, Kang J. Influencing factors and consequences of workplace bullying among nurses: a structural equation modeling. Asian nursing research. 2018;12(1):26-33.
  29. Misra R, Crist M, Burant CJ. Relationships among life stress, social support, academic stressors, and reactions to stressors of international students in the United States. International Journal of Stress Management. 2003;10(2):137.
  30. Hooman H, Ahadi H, Sepah Mansoor M, Sheikhi M. Modeling loneliness based on spiritual well-being, self-efficacy, and satisfaction from life. Psychological research. 2010;2(7):19-32.
  31. Jyoti J, Rani A. Role of burnout and mentoring between high performance work system and intention to leave: Moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Research. 2019;98:166-76.
  32. Teo ST, Bentley T, Nguyen D. Psychosocial work environment, work engagement, and employee commitment: A moderated, mediation model. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2020;88:102415.
  33. Ahmad S. Can ethical leadership inhibit workplace bullying across East and West: Exploring cross-cultural interactional justice as a mediating mechanism. European Management Journal. 2018;36(2):223-234.
  34. Paciello M, Fida R, Tramontano C, Ghezzi V, Barbaranelli C. Phenomenological configurations of workplace bullying: A cluster approach. Personality and individual differences. 2019;151(109395):1-12.
  35. Murphy K, Torres E, Ingram W, Hutchinson J. A review of high performance work practices (HPWPs) literature and recommendations for future research in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 2018;30(1):365-388.
  36. Lambert EG, Liu J, Jiang S, Zhang J, Kelley TM. The antecedents of job involvement: An exploratory study among Chinese prison staff. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice. 2018;54:21-33.
  37. Gülbahar B. The relationship between work engagement and organizational trust: A study of elementary school teachers in Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2017;5(2):149-59.
  38. Creasy T, Carnes A. The effects of workplace bullying on team learning, innovation and project success as mediated through virtual and traditional team dynamics. International Journal of Project Management. 2017;35(6):964-77.
  39. Spence Laschinger HK, Nosko A. Exposure to workplace bullying and post‐traumatic stress disorder symptomology: the role of protective psychological resources. Journal of nursing management. 2015;23(2):252-62.
  40. López-Cabarcos MÁ, Vazquez-Rodriguez P, Pineiro-Chousa J, Caby J. The role of bullying in the development of organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Research. 2020;115:272-80.